Can Developers Claim Tax Credits for Construction of Rental Properties?

October 3, 2024

On October 3, 2024, the Supreme Court of India issued a landmark ruling on the contentious issue of Goods and Services Tax (GST) Input Tax Credit (ITC) for construction costs associated with properties intended for rental use, profoundly impacting the real estate sector. This pivotal decision emerged from a legal battle involving M/s. Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd., which sought to claim ITC for expenses incurred while building a shopping mall designed to be leased to tenants. Initially, their claim was rejected by tax authorities referencing Section 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, which limits ITC claims on goods and services used for constructing immovable property unless these properties qualify as “plant or machinery.”

Significance of the Supreme Court’s Ruling

Clarifying the “Plant” Exception

The Supreme Court’s ruling has introduced a crucial clarification: if the construction of a building is a necessary condition for providing rental or leasing services, then the building could fall under the “plant” exception within Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. This interpretation arose from the court’s application of a functionality test to ascertain whether a building qualifies as “plant” for ITC purposes. By sidestepping the need to reinterpret Section 17(5)(d), the court concluded that rental properties meet the criteria for the “plant” exception, based primarily on their functional role in generating rental income.

This decision has momentous implications, as it allows developers to reclaim taxes paid on inputs used in constructing rental properties, which had previously been restricted. By doing so, it alleviates the burden of double taxation, which had been a significant concern for the real estate industry. This move is aligned with the broader objectives of the GST regime, aiming to prevent cascading taxes and ensuring that businesses can reclaim taxes paid on inputs.

Impacts on Real Estate Developers

Real estate developers who focus on constructing properties meant for lease or rent will find this ruling particularly advantageous. It narrows the tax disparities between developers who sell properties and those who lease them, promoting a more balanced and fair taxation environment. By allowing ITC claims on construction costs, the ruling encourages investment in rental properties, which can lead to increased development activities and potentially more affordable rental options for consumers.

The ruling also underscores the importance of a functional and pragmatic approach to tax interpretation. By recognizing the essential role of buildings in the rental business, the court has provided clarity that will guide future legal interpretations regarding ITC claims related to rental properties. This clarity is expected to facilitate smoother tax compliance and planning for developers, reducing the likelihood of protracted legal disputes and fostering a more predictable business environment.

Broader Implications for the Real Estate and Leasing Sectors

Ensuring Equitable Tax Treatment

The Supreme Court’s decision is a significant step towards ensuring equitable tax treatment across different business models within the real estate market. By treating rental properties as eligible for ITC under the “plant” exception, the ruling helps balance the tax liabilities between businesses that lease properties and those that sell them outright. This equitable treatment is essential for fostering a competitive and vibrant real estate market, where developers can choose the business model that best suits their strategic goals without being unduly influenced by tax considerations.

Moreover, this ruling reflects a nuanced understanding of the broader goals of the GST regime. By preventing the cascading effect of taxes and allowing for the reclaiming of input credits, the decision promotes a taxation system that is both rational and supportive of business activities. This functionality test approach ensures that taxation is aligned with the economic realities of doing business, encouraging compliance and supporting the growth of the real estate sector.

Looking Forward

On October 3, 2024, the Supreme Court of India handed down a landmark decision affecting the real estate industry regarding Goods and Services Tax (GST) Input Tax Credit (ITC) for property construction costs intended for rental purposes. This significant ruling came from a legal dispute involving M/s. Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd., which attempted to claim ITC on expenses incurred in building a shopping mall to be leased out to tenants. Tax authorities initially denied this claim by citing Section 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act. This section restricts ITC claims on goods and services used in constructing immovable properties unless they are categorized as “plant or machinery.” Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. contested this interpretation, arguing that denying ITC for rental properties was both unfair and counterproductive for the industry’s growth. The Supreme Court’s decision is poised to impact the future of ITC claims within the real estate sector, potentially altering how tax benefits are applied to rental property developments.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later